Reviews

3.8
Based on 2 reviews and 18 answers
0
0
0
0
0
"I wish I knew about this website when I was about to choose School"
Lisa, parent
"Finally, one can access the opinions of other students completely transparently."
Fredrik, student
Get access to exclusive content, available only on SchoolParrot!
1 month
£2.99
First month. Then £4.99 / month
1 year
£19
Best valueFirst year. Then £39 / year.

For Schools and school staff

Do you work as a principal or school staff? Take control of your SchoolParrot profile. Click here
Former Student
May 13, 2022

this school was great, miss it so much

I miss this place. everyone here is amazing. from class teachers to catering staff, I have not a bad word to say about any of them. I don't know what it's like now, but the food in the cafeteria was good and there was always some variety. they were really good at getting my dyslexia checked right after being asked to, and the outdoor space is big enough that you don't trip over people when you're outside playing. homework and class work is manageable and a lot of classwork is catered to your ability so you're being challenged but not overwhelmed.
overall I loved going here and very much miss it
Former Student
Jan 13, 2021

miss this school so much

went to commercial from primary 3 to primary 7, best school ever. my teachers were very inclusive and woke. they made my primary school experience one i want to relive every single day of. primary 7 was amazing. teachers always helped if i needed it. extremely fair rules and consequences aswell. would do anything to go back.
Woodmill Road, KY11 4BB, Dunfermline
01383 602448

About SchoolParrot

  • SchoolParrot is a review site for schools. We are a company that believes in more transparency within schools. Our platform is open to all users.
    Read about SchoolParrot and our company
  • Reviews are published in real-time without moderation and we want to encourage our users to provide constructive feedback and keep a serious tone. The responsibility lies with the user.
    Read our review guidelines